Comparison
Rezi vs Teal, dimension by dimension
Both products are scored on the RoleSprint Decision-First Score, a rubric we publish and that weights deciding which roles are worth pursuing over producing applications faster. That weighting is a position, not a neutral measure, and it is the first thing to disagree with if you disagree with the result.
Which is better, Rezi or Teal?
Teal takes it 63 to 52 out of 100 on the RoleSprint Decision-First Score. Rezi leads on evidence-based fit; Teal leads on opportunity prioritization, transparency, search-strategy clarity, workflow utility, privacy and claim discipline; they are level on candidate control. The widest single gap is opportunity prioritization, 4 points to Teal, so that is the dimension to decide on if you care about only one. Taken on their own, Rezi is strongest on candidate control at 15 of 15, and Teal on candidate control at 15 of 15. They also work differently. Rezi: You apply yourself. Rezi produces the document; submission is entirely manual. Teal: You apply yourself. Teal saves roles from a browser extension, tracks their status, and generates tailored resumes and cover letters against a saved job description. The rubric is ours, it is published in full, and RoleSprint sells against both of these products.
- Total, on the published rubric
- Rezi 52 of 100, Teal 63 of 100. RoleSprint scores 85 on the same rubric, which we wrote.
- Widest gap
- Opportunity prioritization, 4 points to Teal.
- Rezi pricing
- Published and readable without an account. Read on 2026-08-30 at rezi.ai/pricing: Free at $0 with one resume, one AI interview and three PDF downloads; Pro at $29 per month with unlimited AI; a Lifetime plan at $149 as a single payment; and an Enterprise tier at $99 per month per 200 users aimed at universities and agencies rather than individuals.
- Teal pricing
- Published and readable without an account. Read on 2026-08-30 at tealhq.com/pricing: Teal+ at $13 every 7 days, $29 every 30 days, or $79 every 90 days, each shown with a per-day equivalent. A free tier is offered indefinitely, and the page states no credit card is required to start.
- How each one applies
- Rezi: You apply yourself. Rezi produces the document; submission is entirely manual. Teal: You apply yourself. Teal saves roles from a browser extension, tracks their status, and generates tailored resumes and cover letters against a saved job description.
- What this comparison is not
- Not a hands-on test. No paid account was created for either product, so nothing here rests on using them; it rests on their own published pages, read on the dates shown, and on a rubric you can read and disagree with.
Source and method
Rezi and Teal live pages, plus the RoleSprint Decision-First Score rubric. Verified 2026-08-30. Product facts and pricing are read from each vendor's own pages on the dates recorded; where the two records were verified on different dates, the earlier date is shown so nothing looks fresher than it is. Scores and totals are RoleSprint's, computed from the rubric published at /compare/methodology, last updated 2026-08-27. RoleSprint publishes these pages and sells a competing product. The rubric they are scored on is ours, it is published in full, and RoleSprint is scored on it alongside everything else — including on the dimensions where it does not win. Read the rubric before trusting any total on this page, including ours.
Every dimension, both products, and us
Rezi 52, Teal 63, RoleSprint 85, each out of 100.
| Dimension | Rezi | Teal | RoleSprint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opportunity prioritization/ 25 | 4 | 8 | 22 |
| Evidence-based fit/ 20 | 12 | 11 | 17 |
| Candidate control/ 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Transparency/ 15 | 10 | 12 | 13 |
| Search-strategy clarity/ 10 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Workflow utility/ 10 | 7 | 9 | 5 |
| Privacy and claim discipline/ 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Total/ 100 | 52 | 63 | 85 |
Why each score is what it is
The reasoning per dimension, for both products, so a disagreement can be about the argument rather than the number.
Opportunity prioritizationRezi 4, Teal 8, RoleSprint 22, out of 25
Rezi. Rezi operates on a posting you have already chosen. Nothing in the product addresses whether that posting deserved your time, which is the decision that determines the return on everything downstream.
Teal. Teal saves and organises roles you have already found and lets you rate them yourself, which is real but manual: the product records your priority rather than informing it. Nothing in it evaluates whether a saved role is a good use of your time.
Evidence-based fitRezi 12, Teal 11, RoleSprint 17, out of 20
Rezi. Keyword targeting against a job description plus a document score is a real, specific comparison and better than most of this category. It measures the document against the posting rather than your history against the requirements, and the scoring method is not published.
Teal. Resume tailoring works against a saved job description and surfaces keyword alignment, which is a genuine comparison between your document and a posting. It stops at the document: there is no published assessment of whether your history evidences the requirements.
Candidate controlRezi 15, Teal 15, RoleSprint 15, out of 15
Rezi. Full marks. Rezi produces documents; you decide what to do with them.
Teal. Full marks. Teal submits nothing, automates no outreach, and every action is one you take. On this dimension it is level with RoleSprint, and both are ahead of every auto-apply product scored here.
TransparencyRezi 10, Teal 12, RoleSprint 13, out of 15
Rezi. Prices are public including a lifetime option, and the free tier's limits are enumerated exactly. Points withheld on the other two criteria: the Rezi Score has no published methodology, and the 62% interview claim carries no denominator or definition.
Teal. Prices are public and stated three ways with per-day equivalents, the free tier is described feature by feature, and the page states no card is needed to start. Points withheld because how the AI credits are consumed is not published.
Search-strategy clarityRezi 2, Teal 4, RoleSprint 9, out of 10
Rezi. A resume builder has no view of the target set, and Rezi does not claim one.
Teal. The tracker makes the shape of a search visible — how many roles, at what stage — which is more than most products offer. It does not interpret that shape or tell you the target set is incoherent.
Workflow utilityRezi 7, Teal 9, RoleSprint 5, out of 10
Rezi. Strong for what it covers — writing, editing, scoring, cover letters, an interview feature — but the covered surface is the document rather than the search.
Teal. Near full marks. Browser extension, tracker, document storage and per-role tailoring in one place is a genuinely strong workflow, and better than RoleSprint's on this dimension.
Privacy and claim disciplineRezi 2, Teal 4, RoleSprint 4, out of 5
Rezi. Publishing "62% of Rezi users land an interview" on the pricing page without a denominator, time window or definition of user is the main deduction. It may well be true; as published it cannot be checked.
Teal. Marketing language is aspirational but restrained, and no unverifiable hiring-outcome statistic appears on the pricing page.
Who should pick which
Choose Rezi
Someone whose resume is genuinely the constraint: it is not getting past screens, it is poorly structured, or it is not written against the posting. Rezi is a focused, mature product for that job, its free tier is honest about where it stops, and the lifetime option is a real alternative to a subscription for anyone who expects to job-hunt more than once.
The full Rezi reviewChoose Teal
Someone running a high-volume search across many roles who is losing track of what they sent where, and who wants one place to store roles, tailor documents and see the pipeline. Teal's tracker is a real product doing a real job, its free tier is unusually generous for this category, and if disorganisation is genuinely your bottleneck it will help more than anything RoleSprint does.
The full Teal reviewNeither product is RoleSprint, and for some readers neither is the right answer. If both are optimising the production of applications and your applications are already going out in reasonable numbers without converting, the thing to change is which roles you are spending them on, and that is a different category of tool.
Who published this and what they sell
RoleSprint publishes these pages and sells a competing product. The rubric they are scored on is ours, it is published in full, and RoleSprint is scored on it alongside everything else — including on the dimensions where it does not win. Read the rubric before trusting any total on this page, including ours.
No paid account was created for either product. Facts were read from each vendor’s own live pages on the dates shown above, and anything only visible behind a sign-up is recorded as unverified rather than estimated.
What to do next
Both products change how many applications you send. Whether that is your bottleneck is a separate question, and it is answerable with numbers you already have.