Skip to content

Career Escape

Moving from massage therapist to magnetic resonance imaging technologists, by the occupational data

Both occupations are described by the same O*NET 30.3 rating system, which makes them directly comparable: the same requirements, rated for each. What follows is that comparison for massage therapists and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists, not an opinion about whether the move is a good idea.

Can a massage therapist become a magnetic resonance imaging technologists?

The overlap here is narrower than the two job titles suggest: 46% of what O*NET 30.3 rates as important to either occupation is important to both. The requirements that carry across include Assisting and Caring for Others, Performing for or Working Directly with the Public, Medicine and Dentistry. Both sit at O*NET Job Zone 3, so the typical education, training and experience expected is the band you are already in. BLS lists associate's degree as the typical entry education here, against postsecondary nondegree award for massage therapists. What would be new concentrates in work activities: Repairing and Maintaining Electronic Equipment, Controlling Machines and Processes, Guiding, Directing, and Motivating Subordinates. BLS puts the 2025 national median wage for magnetic resonance imaging technologistss at $95,480 against $58,450 for massage therapists, a difference of 63% upward at the occupational level rather than for any individual move. BLS projects employment in the destination occupation to grow 7.7% between 2025 and 2035, with about 2,300 openings a year on average. O*NET describes the destination as follows: Operate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners. This compares two occupations, not two people, and says nothing about whether any individual would be hired.

Weighted overlap
46% of the requirements important to either occupation are important to both, with 2 of those shared requirements classed as distinctive rather than near-universal.
Preparation level
O*NET Job Zone 3, against Job Zone 3 for massage therapists. Typically one level of further education.
Typical entry education (BLS)
Associate's degree, against Postsecondary nondegree award for massage therapists.
Prior experience typically expected
Less than 5 years, with no on-the-job training category assigned.
Where the overlap is strongest
Knowledge, with 2 distinctive requirements important to both. Requirements that carry over include Assisting and Caring for Others, Performing for or Working Directly with the Public, Medicine and Dentistry.
Independent corroboration
O*NET does not list this as directly related to the source occupation; it appears one step out, related to a related occupation. The overlap measure and the relatedness file disagree here, and both are shown rather than one being quietly dropped.

Source and method

O*NET 30.3 Database, with BLS Employment Projections Table 5.4. Verified 2026-09-02. Importance ratings, Job Zones and occupational titles are read from O*NET. Typical entry education, prior experience and on-the-job training are read from BLS. The weighted overlap percentage, the distinctive-requirement counts, and the shared and new requirement lists are computed by RoleSprint from those inputs using the method published at /career-change/methodology.

Career transition data

Massage Therapist to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

Work activities overlapderived
41%
Knowledge overlapderived
57%
Transferable skills overlapderived
26%
Essential skills overlapderived
100%
Job Zone
3 to 3 (no change)
Median annual wage, 2025
$58,450 to $95,480
Wage differencederived
+$37,030 (+63%)
Projected employment change, 2025–35
+7.7%
Annual openings, 2025–35 average
2,300
Typical entry education
Associate's degree

Largest transferable capability: Assisting and Caring for Others

Largest new demand: Physics

Source. Job Zone and requirement ratings: O*NET 30.3. Wage, employment projections, openings and entry education: BLS Employment Projections Table 1.2, projections 2025–35, wage year 2025. RoleSprint-derived. Overlap percentages and the wage difference are calculated by RoleSprint from those published values. Limitation. These are national occupational statistics for two occupations. The wage figure is not a salary you would be offered, employment growth is not job security, and overlap is not a likelihood of being hired. Fields BLS does not publish for an occupation are omitted rather than estimated.

What carries over

Requirements O*NET rates as important for both massage therapists and magnetic resonance imaging technologistss, by domain. Most distinctive first, so the top of each list is the part that is actually worth putting on a resume.

Work activities

20 of 34 work activities important to either occupation are important to both.

  • Assisting and Caring for Others4.6 for massage therapists, 4.4 here
  • Performing for or Working Directly with the Public4.5 for massage therapists, 4.2 here
  • Performing Administrative Activities3.3 for massage therapists, 3.2 here
  • Handling and Moving Objects3.4 for massage therapists, 3.9 here
  • Performing General Physical Activities4.2 for massage therapists, 3.3 here

Knowledge

6 of 10 knowledge areas important to either occupation are important to both.

  • Medicine and Dentistry3.1 for massage therapists, 3.5 here
  • Biology3.3 for massage therapists, 3.0 here
  • Psychology3.3 for massage therapists, 3.0 here
  • Public Safety and Security3.0 for massage therapists, 3.5 here
  • Customer and Personal Service4.6 for massage therapists, 4.2 here

Transferable skills

4 of 10 transferable skills important to either occupation are important to both.

  • Service Orientation3.3 for massage therapists, 3.1 here
  • Social Perceptiveness3.3 for massage therapists, 3.1 here
  • Complex Problem Solving3.0 for massage therapists, 3.1 here
  • Judgment and Decision Making3.1 for massage therapists, 3.0 here

Essential skills

7 of 7 essential skills important to either occupation are important to both.

  • Active Learning3.0 for massage therapists, 3.1 here
  • Writing3.0 for massage therapists, 3.1 here
  • Reading Comprehension3.0 for massage therapists, 3.9 here
  • Monitoring3.0 for massage therapists, 3.8 here
  • Speaking3.6 for massage therapists, 3.6 here

Numbers are O*NET Importance, on a 1 to 5 scale. A requirement counts as important at 3.0 and above, which is the threshold the whole comparison uses.

What would be new

Requirements important for magnetic resonance imaging technologistss and not important for massage therapists. This is the part you would have to be able to evidence, and it is usually the real obstacle rather than the job title.

Work activities

6 work activities rated important here and not for massage therapists.

  • Repairing and Maintaining Electronic Equipment3.0 here, 1.5 for massage therapists
  • Controlling Machines and Processes3.9 here, 1.6 for massage therapists
  • Guiding, Directing, and Motivating Subordinates3.4 here, 2.3 for massage therapists
  • Coaching and Developing Others3.6 here, 2.5 for massage therapists
  • Developing and Building Teams3.1 here, 2.6 for massage therapists

Knowledge

3 knowledge areas rated important here and not for massage therapists.

  • Physics4.0 here, 1.6 for massage therapists
  • Education and Training3.4 here, 2.7 for massage therapists
  • Computers and Electronics3.6 here, 1.9 for massage therapists

Transferable skills

6 transferable skills rated important here and not for massage therapists.

  • Operation and Control3.3 here, 1.0 for massage therapists
  • Operations Monitoring3.6 here, 1.4 for massage therapists
  • Systems Analysis3.0 here, 2.1 for massage therapists
  • Instructing3.0 here, 2.3 for massage therapists
  • Time Management3.0 here, 2.9 for massage therapists

Practical caveats for this move

Specific to this pair, and worth reading before treating any of the above as a plan.

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists sits at the same Job Zone as massage therapists, so the typical preparation band does not change. That removes one obstacle and none of the others.
  • BLS records "Less than 5 years" of prior experience in a related occupation as typical for this role. Whether your current work counts as related is an employer's judgement, and it is the single thing most worth testing against a real posting.
  • O*NET does not list this destination as directly related to your current occupation. It reached this map through the requirement overlap, one step out. That is a weaker corroboration than a directly related occupation, and it is shown rather than hidden.
  • None of this accounts for licensing, geography, pay, hiring volume, or whether you would want the work. Occupational data describes the job. It does not describe the market for it, and it does not describe you.
How the overlap measure works

How this move compares with the alternatives

This page is one move. The Opportunity Atlas puts every destination mapped from massage therapists side by side on skills overlap, day-to-day work, wage, projected growth, openings and the size of the training step.

It does not rank them, because the dimensions genuinely disagree: measured across every transition published here, how much your skills carry over and how much your knowledge carries over are close to unrelated. You choose which one matters and it orders by that.

Compare the alternatives in the Opportunity Atlas

The destination occupation, as O*NET describes it

Operate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners. Monitor patient safety and comfort, and view images of area being scanned to ensure quality of pictures. May administer gadolinium contrast dosage intravenously. May interview patient, explain MRI procedures, and position patient on examining table. May enter into the computer data such as patient history, anatomical area to be scanned, orientation specified, and position of entry.

O*NET-SOC 29-2035.00. Full title: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists. Where this page uses the shorter phrase “magnetic resonance imaging technologists”, that is a common name for readability, not a separate occupational classification.

This page includes information from the O*NET 30.3 Database by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Used under the CC BY 4.0 license. O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA. RoleSprint has modified all or some of this information. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested these modifications. Analysis generated 2026-09-02 from the O*NET 30.3 Database. Entry education, work experience, and on-the-job training are reproduced from BLS Employment Projections Table 5.4, Education and training assignments by detailed occupation, 2024, published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

What to do next

Occupational data compares two jobs. It cannot tell you whether one specific employer would consider you, and this is the point where most people stop reading data and start applying blind.

No credit card requiredStart free